One Size Fits Most? Ok.

One size fits most is the motto Brandy Melville clothing has adopted, their one size being a small.  The retail store originating from Europe has made its way overseas, and has multiple locations in the United States.  Their unique and controversial branding has caused a major stir among the public.

Founded by Silvio Marsan and his son, the company gained popularity quickly in the states.  With prices comparable to brands like American Eagle or Forever 21, Brandy Melville stands as a strong competitor to teen based companies.  However, unlike other companies who cater to smaller sized women, Brandy Melville carries no large sizes, and very few mediums.  With sizes that fit no one above a size two, the brand advertises an image that goes above and beyond other brands that promote thin lifestyles.  Unlike Abercrombie & Fitch, who despite being criticized for advertising thin customers still carries sizes up to a 14, Brandy Melville does not give the option for many to buy their clothes.

They advertise a very specific demographic, with Instagram pictures consisting completely of leggy white girls without any sign of fat on their bodies.  They emphasize the thigh gap and mid drifts revealing washboard abs, yet insist that there is something for everyone in the store.  If they clothes don’t fit, there are always accessories that customers can purchase.brandy

What are the ethical dilemmas regarding this choice of brand advertising?  Is blatant exclusivity acceptable in the fashion industry?

First off, the creators of the brand are men.  How hypocritical is that?  Whether or not it was intended, creating clothing that only fits a size small and advertising them with a very narrow demographic suggests that the owners only accept certain body images.  This is detrimental to the public who on average, are a much bigger size than a zero or two.  They feel pressured to conform to the company’s norm, or they shun the product completely.  The exclusivity in the ads suggest that people who don’t fit into those sizes are outcasts, and this says a lot about the brand’s mission.  Do we want to endorse a product that believes in the exclusion of others? Maybe, I guess it’s up to you.

2 thoughts on “One Size Fits Most? Ok.

  1. I think that exclusivity is acceptable as a means for selling a product. But, this message is pretty unfair and untrue. Very few people fit a size small, and the ads imply that belonging to this exclusive “majority” is good. It is another example of the fashion industry creating unrealistic expectations about body image. Crazy.


  2. This is just like how A&F was, they only promote lifestyles of beautiful people and by beautiful people it means skinny and tall girls and guys with six-packs. This is not fair but every brand has their target market and focus i guess it is not wrong to focus on S-size people as long as they do not discriminate against people of other sizes because there are also brands that are only for plus size people.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s