News Is Going Native

Last week there was a story online about an Apple delivery truck died in the middle of the street in Chicago and was blocking traffic. The street was one way and was causing huge backup which was delaying some other important city traffic, but an amazing neighbor who is now a local hero is being praised for their quick response because tow trucks could not get to the truck to help. The neighbor heard the shouts and immediately came out with a can of BP gasoline. He poured it in the gas tank and the car began moving which helped traffic resume and all deliveries was made for the day. Remember that article? Yeah, me neither, but it could be the start of a growing trend.


The Guardian, an online newspaper, announced last month that it was making a “branded content and innovation agency” which is partnered with Unilever (Kutsch, 2014). The Guardian is engaging in what is known as native advertising. Native advertising is a blurring of the lines of journalism and advertising. It’s essentially the print version of an infomercial.


What’s really blurring the lines here is that unlike traditional advertising, which uses outside companies to write and pay for ads, the ads are written by in house reporters who produce content for outside companies (Kutsch, 2014). This is a cause for concern because the lines between what an editorial are and what an advertisement are may be delineated only through the notifications that what you’re reading is an advertisement and those notifications are typically small or not as highlighted. For a profession which is supposed to be objective, they are now employees of the advertising business.


The reason for moving to native advertising is because news media sources are struggling to replace a decline in print with digital sales and while digital sales have risen, only about 12% of Americans and 9% of Brits say they’ve paid for digital news (Kutsch, 2014). Many companies and advertisers see native advertising as a more effective way to generate attention from online customers than through traditional banner advertisements (Kutsch, 2014). As long as the ads are clearly marked as ads, I can see these being effective and more fun to read, but if not then I could foresee lawsuits against many of these journalists or advertisers for purposely deceiving the general public.


The FTC, which usually regulates this type of stuff, is currently working on a policy for native advertising (Kutsch, 2014). However, until this is established, advertisers currently have free reign for this sort of business. This can be a boon for the consumer who will see typically objective professionals writing for advertisers who may not know their profession as well.


Here’s just one example of a type of native advertising:


(Image courtesy of

How do you feel about this? Let me know in the comments!





Kutsch, T. (2014, March 08). The blurred lines of native advertising. AlJazeera America. Retrieved from

3 thoughts on “News Is Going Native

  1. While I personally don’t have a problem with this, I can see why this can be an ethical issue in advertising. The people who wrote the buzzfeed article for example should be writing from his/her own opinion about Sony. There is a clash in conflict when the partner is Sony Entertainment because who knows if he’s just saying this because he’s getting paid. I agree that the blurring line with native advertising is distinguishing who is writing their own opinions or if there are other influences.


  2. I have a huge problem with this. I think it’s unethical because people go online to see content that was written by a genuine author who wants to provide accurate information, not someone who was paid to give consumers a biased overview of a specific product or thing. I think buzzfeed is head in the wrong direction with this and a lot of people will start noticing and complaining!


  3. This is very unfortunate to see. News sites should be third party sources of information that either stem from the opinion of the writer, or remain entirely unbiased. To me, it devalues the new source to be posting articles endorsed or written by a specific company.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s