Netflix “casts” themselves into larger waters


(Image courtesy of

Being a college student these days, we’re all connected all the time. Many of us in class take notes on our laptops instead of pen and paper. We’re always on our phones getting texts, checking Twitter, and replying to various other social media platforms. As a college student, our connection also leads to entertainment. After a hard day of classes, before we hit the books or even after, many of us will queue up streaming video via Hulu or Netflix.

Netflix has recently announced a deal with Comcast which will provide a high quality Netflix experience for years to come (Macke, 2014). Wait a second though! We are already paying Internet Service Providers (ISPs) mega bucks for our internet, so why is Netflix entering this agreement with them when we already pay for these services? Well, that’s part of the outcry! Many have fears over the whole net neutrality argument that has been going on for about a year or so now and whether this is violating it. For those that have no idea what net neutrality is, in short all ISPs and governments should treat the internet equally and not discriminating by charging differently for other services.

The reason this agreement may violate the net neutrality is that Comcast is charging Netflix to guarantee that their services stream high quality. According to Macke of Yahoo, Netflix “opted to release the entire second season of the program at once, causing download delays and triggering widespread accusations of so-called “throttling,” or slowing of data feeds, by ISPs” (Macke, 2014). The fact that Comcast was already throttling meant that they most likely forced Netflix’s hand to have to pay a “fee” in order to make sure their service works the way it should for Comcast’s subscribers.

Based on this information, many subscribes are wondering if Netflix may change their rates. Macke says that Netflix is already paying third parties and intermediaries for much of their throughput from their source to your house and that the Comcast deal supposedly gets rid of the intermediaries (Macke, 2014).

What does this mean in the long run though and why should we all care? One of the arguments for net neutrality is that it keeps the internet open and accessible for all people. The worry now is that Comcast will have better streaming for Netflix which will drive customers to abandon their current ISPs in favor of Comcast. In addition to Comcast’s recent acquisition of Time Warner, this accounts for 1/3 of the US internet usage coming out of a single company. All of this together is worrisome because it could lead to a monopoly.

As a user of Netflix and a proponent of net neutrality, I am worried where this will lead us. What does everyone else think?


Macke, J. (2014, February 24). Chill-out: Netflix paying comcast for streaming is a win for consumers. Retrieved from–netflix-paying-comcast-for-streaming-is-a-win-for-consumers-145347877.html

9 thoughts on “Netflix “casts” themselves into larger waters

  1. I remember a couple of years ago Netflix pulled all of their films from one studio, I’m not sure who it was. It’s great to see that they’re re-expanding their repertoire.
    I’m definitely hoping they won’t begin charging unnecessary fees or adding new restrictions as they become even more widespread.


    • Yeah, I remember them pulling movies too. I thought that was about contracts with networks like HBO, Starz, etc that bought the rights to those movies so that Netflix couldn’t show them.


  2. I believe that Net Neutrality is important and that people should not be charged different rates for different services. I am interested in seeing how this partnership plays out. I currently have Comcast and Netflix so it will be interesting to see the changes. I hope that the quality of either does not go down with this merging of two huge businesses.


    • Interesting. Well, Comcast may have been throttling you before so it’ll be interesting to see if your Netflix experience improves. I have RCN and I get some AWESOME streaming, but I have a larger internet package and the most basic of cable because I can find anything I want online for free.


  3. This is really exciting news. I am a subscriber of Netflix but stopped using it for some time because many of the shows or movies were not updated. I wonder what new things are going to be now on Netflix and if more people will not joining it. Also, I wonder how these two things will integrate with each other.


  4. This definitely sounds like the development of a monopoly. Very fishy. I have a feeling relationships like this will start popping up all over our web-based lives, which could have some pretty serious repercussions, particularly with how “dependent” we have become. These companies know they can get away with just about anything, because we’re not about to stop using their products.


  5. If it brings more variety then that’s good. Right now I pay the 8.95/month for the streaming. Which most people, including myself, admit is much better with TV shows then movies. They probably will raise their rates, which last time they did that, really ticked off customers.


  6. I honestly don’t think a monopoly is what you have to worry about here. I live in an apartment off campus and when I was in the process of finding a cable/internet provider, it was between AT&T and RCA because Comcast was just way out of the ballpark in terms of price.


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s